Home > Climate Change > >Brrrrrr…it’s getting cold around here…

>Brrrrrr…it’s getting cold around here…

>In the remake of Dirty Harry called Frosty Harry the title character utters the famous line, “Do you feel the cold, punk? Well? Do ya?”

It’s pretty clear to anyone who is intellectually honest that the whole Climate Change Schtick has pretty much had the gong.

“The sun, the sun,” cried Tattoo to the ever suave Ricardo Montalban, to continue the crappy TV/Movie theme.

It’s been clear for at least 5 years that the cause of earth’s changes in weather (aka climate) is that great, glowing ball of life giving energy parked just 8.31 light minutes away.

Will Livingstone and Matthew Penn of the National Solar Observatory in Tuscon, Arizona, are more of those pesky Big Oil, Big Tobacco, Big Business so-called deniers that are deliberately trying to promote the deniers’ position.

We have observed spectroscopic changes in temperature sensitive molecular lines, in the magnetic splitting of an Fe I line, and in the continuum brightness of over 1000 sunspot umbrae from 1990-2005. All three measurements show consistent trends in which the darkest parts of the sunspot umbra have become warmer (45K per year) and their magnetic field strengths have decreased (77 Gauss per year), independently of the normal 11-year sunspot cycle. A linear extrapolation of these trends suggests that few sunspots will be visible after 2015.

Sunspots are cool dark regions on the solar surface with strong magnetic fields. There have been few direct measurements of changes in the physical parameters of sunspots, but here we present a study which shows that sunspots are becoming warmer and have weaker magnetic fields. The number of sunspots visible on the Sun normally shows an 11-year periodicity, and the current sunspot cycle (cycle 23) had a maximum in 2001, and is entering a minimum phase with few sunspots currently visible. Our data show that there are additional changes occurring in sunspots, independent of the sunspot cycle, and these trends suggest that sunspots will disappear completely. Such an event would not be unprecedented, since during a famous episode from 1645-1715, known as the Maunder Minimum, the normal 11-year periodicity vanished and there were virtually no sunspots visible on the solar surface (Eddy 1976). Recent studies of the appearance rate and latitudinal drift of sunspots (Hathaway et al., 2004) and of the solar magnetic field (Svalgard etal, 2005) predict that the number of sunspots visible in future cycles will be significantly reduced. Finally the occurrence of prolonged periods with no sunspots is important to climate studies, since the Maunder Minimum was shown to correspond with the reduced average global temperatures on the Earth (Foukal et al., 1990).


The line depth of OH 1565.3 nm for individual spots. The upper trace is the smoothed sunspot number showing the past and current sunspot cycles; the OH line depth change seems to smoothly decrease independently of the sunspot cycle.

Leif Svalgard noted on Solar Cylce 24 forum relative to this paper that “There was a tiny pore on Aug 22nd, 2008. Bill Livingston measured its magnetic field and tells me today that it was 1931 Gauss. You may verify for yourself that that falls straight on his projected line. BTW, he has many other data points now between the last data shown on the plot and this latest one, and they also confirm the trend.”

The sun is not doing what it has done for the last couple of hundred years but Big Green and their Useful Idiots don’t care.

Truth is not part of their platform.

(H/T Icecap)

(Nothing Follows)

Advertisements
Categories: Climate Change
  1. August 27, 2008 at 5:16 pm

    >It’s been clear for at least 5 years that the cause of earth’s changes in weather (aka climate) is that great, glowing ball of life giving energy parked just 8.31 light minutes away. – you think the sun is the only thing which affects climate? So, show us the 100% correlation between solar activity and climate.

  2. August 27, 2008 at 10:10 pm

    >Fudgie,I have never claimed that the sun has a 100% correlation with our climate, as you well know. It seems to be about 65-70%. Without it, though, other forcings (whatever they are) cannot maintain temperature, as we’re seeing at the moment with low solar activity and falling temperatures.

  3. August 28, 2008 at 8:04 am

    >Mere assertion is not science, fucky. Indulge us with a little maths. Tell us what the climate forcing due to solar activity has been over the last thirty years. Then tell us what you think the other forcings have been. Then tell us what the climate sensitivity is. Multiply the climate sensitivity by the sum of the forcings. What is the answer?

  4. August 29, 2008 at 3:22 pm

    >Yeah! Then divide it by pi!

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: